CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Fujifilm FinePix S205EXR
vs Samsung S1050

Archive illustration for Fujifilm FinePix S205EXR

Fujifilm / 2009

FinePix S205EXR

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung S1050

Samsung / 2007

S1050

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

48 mm²
FinePix S205EXR
38 mm²
S1050
Area ratio
1.27:1
Absolute difference
10 mm²
Relative difference
26.7%

The FinePix S205EXR has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FinePix S205EXRMetricS1050
12 MPEffective pixels10 MP
8 × 6Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2 µmPixel pitch1.95 µm
4 µm²Pixel area3.79 µm²
25 MP/cm²Pixel density26.39 MP/cm²
4.33Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
865 gWeight204 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-ion NP-140 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The FinePix S205EXR has the larger sensor area. The S1050 has the lighter body. The FinePix S205EXR has the higher effective resolution. The FinePix S205EXR is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FinePix S205EXR

Released in 2009, FinePix S205EXR has about 48 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 865 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose S1050

Released in 2007, S1050 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 204 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras