Reasons to choose DS-260HD
Released in 1999, DS-260HD has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 700 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm DS-260HD
vs Fujifilm MX-1200
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
DS-260HD31 mm²
MX-1200- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DS-260HD and MX-1200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DS-260HDMetricMX-1200
1.3 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch5.06 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area25.6 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density3.91 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
700 gWeight240 g
SmartMediaStorageSmartMedia
Lithium-Ion (NP-100) Li-ion batteryBatteryAA NiMH (2) batteries (supplied)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DS-260HD and MX-1200 have the same sensor area. The MX-1200 has the lighter body. The DS-260HD has the higher effective resolution. The DS-260HD and MX-1200 were both released in 1999. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose MX-1200
Released in 1999, MX-1200 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.