CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Fujifilm Bigjob HD1
vs Sanyo Xacti C40

Archive illustration for Fujifilm Bigjob HD1

Fujifilm / 2004

Bigjob HD1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sanyo Xacti C40

Sanyo / 2006

Xacti C40

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Bigjob HD1
21 mm²
Xacti C40
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Bigjob HD1 and Xacti C40 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Bigjob HD1MetricXacti C40
3.14 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.61 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
6.79 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
14.73 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
385 gWeight152 g
xD Picture cardStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Bigjob HD1 and Xacti C40 have the same sensor area. The Xacti C40 has the lighter body. The Xacti C40 has the higher effective resolution. The Xacti C40 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Bigjob HD1

Released in 2004, Bigjob HD1 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 385 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Xacti C40

Released in 2006, Xacti C40 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 152 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras