CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Epson R-D1
vs Nikon D40

Archive illustration for Epson R-D1

Epson / 2004

R-D1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D40

Nikon / 2006

D40

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

370 mm²
R-D1
370 mm²
D40
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The R-D1 and D40 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

R-D1MetricD40
6 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
23.7 × 15.6Sensor23.7 × 15.6
7.85 µmPixel pitch7.79 µm
61.62 µm²Pixel area60.61 µm²
1.62 MP/cm²Pixel density1.65 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
620 gWeight522 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryNikon EN-EL9 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The R-D1 and D40 have the same sensor area. The D40 has the lighter body. The D40 has the higher effective resolution. The D40 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose R-D1

Released in 2004, R-D1 has about 370 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 620 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D40

Released in 2006, D40 has about 370 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 522 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras