CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Epson PhotoPC L-300
vs Epson PhotoPC L-400

Archive illustration for Epson PhotoPC L-300

Epson / 2003

PhotoPC L-300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Epson PhotoPC L-400

Epson / 2003

PhotoPC L-400

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
PhotoPC L-300
25 mm²
PhotoPC L-400
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PhotoPC L-300 and PhotoPC L-400 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

PhotoPC L-300MetricPhotoPC L-400
3.24 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.77 µmPixel pitch2.46 µm
7.67 µm²Pixel area6.06 µm²
13.04 MP/cm²Pixel density16.51 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
185 gWeight185 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PhotoPC L-300 and PhotoPC L-400 have the same sensor area. The PhotoPC L-300 and PhotoPC L-400 have the same body weight. The PhotoPC L-400 has the higher effective resolution. The PhotoPC L-300 and PhotoPC L-400 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PhotoPC L-300

Released in 2003, PhotoPC L-300 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.24 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PhotoPC L-400

Released in 2003, PhotoPC L-400 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras