CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Epson PhotoPC L-200
vs Epson PhotoPC L-410

Archive illustration for Epson PhotoPC L-200

Epson / 2003

PhotoPC L-200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Epson PhotoPC L-410

Epson / 2004

PhotoPC L-410

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
PhotoPC L-200
25 mm²
PhotoPC L-410
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PhotoPC L-200 and PhotoPC L-410 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PhotoPC L-200MetricPhotoPC L-410
2.11 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.43 µmPixel pitch2.49 µm
11.77 µm²Pixel area6.21 µm²
8.49 MP/cm²Pixel density16.1 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
185 gWeight203 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
4x AABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PhotoPC L-200 and PhotoPC L-410 have the same sensor area. The PhotoPC L-200 has the lighter body. The PhotoPC L-410 has the higher effective resolution. The PhotoPC L-410 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PhotoPC L-200

Released in 2003, PhotoPC L-200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PhotoPC L-410

Released in 2004, PhotoPC L-410 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 203 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras