Reasons to choose PhotoPC L-200
Released in 2003, PhotoPC L-200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Epson PhotoPC L-200
vs Epson PhotoPC L-400
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
PhotoPC L-20025 mm²
PhotoPC L-400- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The PhotoPC L-200 and PhotoPC L-400 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
PhotoPC L-200MetricPhotoPC L-400
2.11 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.43 µmPixel pitch2.46 µm
11.77 µm²Pixel area6.06 µm²
8.49 MP/cm²Pixel density16.51 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
185 gWeight185 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The PhotoPC L-200 and PhotoPC L-400 have the same sensor area. The PhotoPC L-200 and PhotoPC L-400 have the same body weight. The PhotoPC L-400 has the higher effective resolution. The PhotoPC L-200 and PhotoPC L-400 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose PhotoPC L-400
Released in 2003, PhotoPC L-400 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.