CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Epson PhotoPC 750 Zoom
vs Fujifilm MX-1200

Archive illustration for Epson PhotoPC 750 Zoom

Epson / 1998

PhotoPC 750 Zoom

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Fujifilm MX-1200

Fujifilm / 1999

MX-1200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
PhotoPC 750 Zoom
31 mm²
MX-1200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PhotoPC 750 Zoom and MX-1200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PhotoPC 750 ZoomMetricMX-1200
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
5.06 µmPixel pitch5.06 µm
25.6 µm²Pixel area25.6 µm²
3.91 MP/cm²Pixel density3.91 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight240 g
Internal storageStorageSmartMedia
AA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)BatteryAA NiMH (2) batteries (supplied)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PhotoPC 750 Zoom and MX-1200 have the same sensor area. The MX-1200 has the lighter body. The PhotoPC 750 Zoom and MX-1200 have the same effective resolution. The MX-1200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PhotoPC 750 Zoom

Released in 1998, PhotoPC 750 Zoom has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose MX-1200

Released in 1999, MX-1200 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras