CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Epson PhotoPC 750 Zoom
vs Fujifilm DS-260HD

Archive illustration for Epson PhotoPC 750 Zoom

Epson / 1998

PhotoPC 750 Zoom

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Fujifilm DS-260HD

Fujifilm / 1999

DS-260HD

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
PhotoPC 750 Zoom
31 mm²
DS-260HD
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PhotoPC 750 Zoom and DS-260HD have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PhotoPC 750 ZoomMetricDS-260HD
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
5.06 µmPixel pitch4.86 µm
25.6 µm²Pixel area23.63 µm²
3.91 MP/cm²Pixel density4.23 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight700 g
Internal storageStorageSmartMedia
AA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)BatteryLithium-Ion (NP-100) Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PhotoPC 750 Zoom and DS-260HD have the same sensor area. The PhotoPC 750 Zoom has the lighter body. The DS-260HD has the higher effective resolution. The DS-260HD is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PhotoPC 750 Zoom

Released in 1998, PhotoPC 750 Zoom has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DS-260HD

Released in 1999, DS-260HD has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 700 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras