CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 4342z
vs Concord Eye-Q 4360z

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 4342z

Concord / 2003

Eye-Q 4342z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 4360z

Concord / 2003

Eye-Q 4360z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Eye-Q 4342z
38 mm²
Eye-Q 4360z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Eye-Q 4342z and Eye-Q 4360z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 4342zMetricEye-Q 4360z
4 MPEffective pixels4 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
196 gWeight160 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q 4342z and Eye-Q 4360z have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 4360z has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 4342z and Eye-Q 4360z have the same effective resolution. The Eye-Q 4342z and Eye-Q 4360z were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4342z

Released in 2003, Eye-Q 4342z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 196 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4360z

Released in 2003, Eye-Q 4360z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras