CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 4330z
vs Concord Eye-Q Go 2000

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 4330z

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q 4330z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q Go 2000

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q Go 2000

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Eye-Q 4330z
38 mm²
Eye-Q Go 2000
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Eye-Q 4330z and Eye-Q Go 2000 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 4330zMetricEye-Q Go 2000
4.1 MPEffective pixels2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.04 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
9.24 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
10.82 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight125 g
CompactFlash type IStorageSecure Digital
4x AABattery1x CR123 Lithium

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q 4330z and Eye-Q Go 2000 have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q Go 2000 has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 4330z has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 4330z and Eye-Q Go 2000 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4330z

Released in 2002, Eye-Q 4330z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q Go 2000

Released in 2002, Eye-Q Go 2000 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras