CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 4060AF
vs Concord Eye-Q 4360z

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 4060AF

Concord / 2003

Eye-Q 4060AF

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 4360z

Concord / 2003

Eye-Q 4360z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Eye-Q 4060AF
38 mm²
Eye-Q 4360z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Eye-Q 4060AF and Eye-Q 4360z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 4060AFMetricEye-Q 4360z
4 MPEffective pixels4 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
118 gWeight160 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q 4060AF and Eye-Q 4360z have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 4060AF has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 4060AF and Eye-Q 4360z have the same effective resolution. The Eye-Q 4060AF and Eye-Q 4360z were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4060AF

Released in 2003, Eye-Q 4060AF has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 118 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4360z

Released in 2003, Eye-Q 4360z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras