CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 2040
vs Concord Eye-Q Go LCD

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 2040

Concord / 2003

Eye-Q 2040

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q Go LCD

Concord / 2003

Eye-Q Go LCD

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Eye-Q 2040
31 mm²
Eye-Q Go LCD
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Eye-Q 2040 and Eye-Q Go LCD have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 2040MetricEye-Q Go LCD
2 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch4.86 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area23.63 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density4.23 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
116 gWeight115 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery1x CR123 Lithium

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q 2040 and Eye-Q Go LCD have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q Go LCD has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 2040 has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 2040 and Eye-Q Go LCD were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 2040

Released in 2003, Eye-Q 2040 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q Go LCD

Released in 2003, Eye-Q Go LCD has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras