CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 1300
vs Concord Eye-Q Duo 2000

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 1300

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q 1300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q Duo 2000

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q Duo 2000

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Eye-Q 1300
38 mm²
Eye-Q Duo 2000
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
7 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The Eye-Q Duo 2000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 1300MetricEye-Q Duo 2000
1.3 MPEffective pixels2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.86 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight156 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
1x CR123 LithiumBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q Duo 2000 has the larger sensor area. The Eye-Q 1300 has the lighter body. The Eye-Q Duo 2000 has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 1300 and Eye-Q Duo 2000 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 1300

Released in 2002, Eye-Q 1300 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q Duo 2000

Released in 2002, Eye-Q Duo 2000 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 156 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras