CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord Eye-Q 1300
vs Concord Eye-Q 2133z

Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 1300

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q 1300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 2133z

Concord / 2002

Eye-Q 2133z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Eye-Q 1300
31 mm²
Eye-Q 2133z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Eye-Q 1300 and Eye-Q 2133z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Eye-Q 1300MetricEye-Q 2133z
1.3 MPEffective pixels2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch3.92 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area15.36 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density6.51 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight238 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
1x CR123 LithiumBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Eye-Q 1300 and Eye-Q 2133z have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 1300 has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 2133z has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 1300 and Eye-Q 2133z were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 1300

Released in 2002, Eye-Q 1300 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 2133z

Released in 2002, Eye-Q 2133z has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 238 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras