CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord DVx
vs Samsung Digimax 101

Archive illustration for Concord DVx

Concord / 2004

DVx

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 101

Samsung / 2002

Digimax 101

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
DVx
31 mm²
Digimax 101
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DVx and Digimax 101 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DVxMetricDigimax 101
2 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch4.86 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area23.63 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density4.23 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
185 gWeight125 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DVx and Digimax 101 have the same sensor area. The Digimax 101 has the lighter body. The DVx has the higher effective resolution. The DVx is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DVx

Released in 2004, DVx has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 101

Released in 2002, Digimax 101 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras