CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 6340z
vs Concord Eye-Q 4363z

Archive illustration for Concord 6340z

Concord / 2004

6340z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 4363z

Concord / 2004

Eye-Q 4363z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
6340z
38 mm²
Eye-Q 4363z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The 6340z and Eye-Q 4363z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

6340zMetricEye-Q 4363z
6.1 MPEffective pixels4.06 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.49 µmPixel pitch3.06 µm
6.21 µm²Pixel area9.33 µm²
16.1 MP/cm²Pixel density10.71 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
176 gWeight150 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 6340z and Eye-Q 4363z have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 4363z has the lighter body. The 6340z has the higher effective resolution. The 6340z and Eye-Q 4363z were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 6340z

Released in 2004, 6340z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 176 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 4363z

Released in 2004, Eye-Q 4363z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.06 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras