CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 5345z
vs Concord 6340z

Archive illustration for Concord 5345z

Concord / 2004

5345z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord 6340z

Concord / 2004

6340z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
5345z
38 mm²
6340z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The 5345z and 6340z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

5345zMetric6340z
5.36 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.66 µmPixel pitch2.49 µm
7.07 µm²Pixel area6.21 µm²
14.14 MP/cm²Pixel density16.1 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight176 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 5345z and 6340z have the same sensor area. The 5345z has the lighter body. The 6340z has the higher effective resolution. The 5345z and 6340z were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 5345z

Released in 2004, 5345z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.36 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose 6340z

Released in 2004, 6340z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 176 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras