CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 4340z
vs Concord 5340z

Archive illustration for Concord 4340z

Concord / 2004

4340z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord 5340z

Concord / 2004

5340z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
4340z
25 mm²
5340z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The 4340z and 5340z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

4340zMetric5340z
4.24 MPEffective pixels5.14 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.42 µmPixel pitch2.2 µm
5.86 µm²Pixel area4.83 µm²
17.07 MP/cm²Pixel density20.69 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight160 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 4340z and 5340z have the same sensor area. The 4340z and 5340z have the same body weight. The 5340z has the higher effective resolution. The 4340z and 5340z were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 4340z

Released in 2004, 4340z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.24 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose 5340z

Released in 2004, 5340z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.14 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras