CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 4042
vs Concord ES500z

Archive illustration for Concord 4042

Concord / 2005

4042

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord ES500z

Concord / 2005

ES500z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
4042
25 mm²
ES500z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The 4042 and ES500z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

4042MetricES500z
4.1 MPEffective pixels5.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.46 µmPixel pitch2.21 µm
6.06 µm²Pixel area4.87 µm²
16.51 MP/cm²Pixel density20.53 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 4042 and ES500z have the same sensor area. The 4042 and ES500z have the same body weight. The ES500z has the higher effective resolution. The 4042 and ES500z were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 4042

Released in 2005, 4042 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ES500z

Released in 2005, ES500z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras