CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 3345z
vs Concord Eye-Q 3343z

Archive illustration for Concord 3345z

Concord / 2004

3345z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord Eye-Q 3343z

Concord / 2004

Eye-Q 3343z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
3345z
21 mm²
Eye-Q 3343z
Area ratio
1.44:1
Absolute difference
9 mm²
Relative difference
44.1%

The 3345z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

3345zMetricEye-Q 3343z
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.15 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.33 × 4
3.15 µmPixel pitch2.6 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area6.77 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density14.77 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
159 gWeight240 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 3345z has the larger sensor area. The 3345z has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 3343z has the higher effective resolution. The 3345z and Eye-Q 3343z were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 3345z

Released in 2004, 3345z has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 159 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3343z

Released in 2004, Eye-Q 3343z has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.15 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras