CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 3046
vs Concord ES500z

Archive illustration for Concord 3046

Concord / 2005

3046

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord ES500z

Concord / 2005

ES500z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
3046
25 mm²
ES500z
Area ratio
1.24:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
23.7%

The 3046 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

3046MetricES500z
3.14 MPEffective pixels5.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.13 µmPixel pitch2.21 µm
9.78 µm²Pixel area4.87 µm²
10.22 MP/cm²Pixel density20.53 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 3046 has the larger sensor area. The 3046 has the lighter body. The ES500z has the higher effective resolution. The 3046 and ES500z were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 3046

Released in 2005, 3046 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ES500z

Released in 2005, ES500z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras