CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 3046
vs Concord 4042

Archive illustration for Concord 3046

Concord / 2005

3046

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord 4042

Concord / 2005

4042

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
3046
25 mm²
4042
Area ratio
1.24:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
23.7%

The 3046 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

3046Metric4042
3.14 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.13 µmPixel pitch2.46 µm
9.78 µm²Pixel area6.06 µm²
10.22 MP/cm²Pixel density16.51 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 3046 has the larger sensor area. The 3046 has the lighter body. The 4042 has the higher effective resolution. The 3046 and 4042 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 3046

Released in 2005, 3046 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose 4042

Released in 2005, 4042 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras