CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 3046
vs Concord 3047

Archive illustration for Concord 3046

Concord / 2005

3046

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord 3047

Concord / 2005

3047

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
3046
31 mm²
3047
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The 3046 and 3047 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

3046Metric3047
3.14 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.13 µmPixel pitch3.15 µm
9.78 µm²Pixel area9.91 µm²
10.22 MP/cm²Pixel density10.09 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight100 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 3046 and 3047 have the same sensor area. The 3046 has the lighter body. The 3046 has the higher effective resolution. The 3046 and 3047 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 3046

Released in 2005, 3046 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose 3047

Released in 2005, 3047 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras