CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 3045
vs Concord 5040

Archive illustration for Concord 3045

Concord / 2005

3045

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord 5040

Concord / 2005

5040

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
3045
38 mm²
5040
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
7 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The 5040 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

3045Metric5040
3.1 MPEffective pixels5.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.15 µmPixel pitch2.73 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area7.43 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density13.46 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight110 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
4x AAABattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 5040 has the larger sensor area. The 3045 has the lighter body. The 5040 has the higher effective resolution. The 3045 and 5040 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 3045

Released in 2005, 3045 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose 5040

Released in 2005, 5040 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras