CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 3045
vs Concord 3046

Archive illustration for Concord 3045

Concord / 2005

3045

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord 3046

Concord / 2005

3046

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
3045
31 mm²
3046
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The 3045 and 3046 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

3045Metric3046
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.14 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.15 µmPixel pitch3.13 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area9.78 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density10.22 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight82 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
4x AAABattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 3045 and 3046 have the same sensor area. The 3046 has the lighter body. The 3046 has the higher effective resolution. The 3045 and 3046 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 3045

Released in 2005, 3045 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose 3046

Released in 2005, 3046 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras