CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 3043
vs Concord 5340z

Archive illustration for Concord 3043

Concord / 2004

3043

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord 5340z

Concord / 2004

5340z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
3043
25 mm²
5340z
Area ratio
1.24:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
23.7%

The 3043 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

3043Metric5340z
3.1 MPEffective pixels5.14 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.15 µmPixel pitch2.2 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area4.83 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density20.69 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight160 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 3043 has the larger sensor area. The 3043 has the lighter body. The 5340z has the higher effective resolution. The 3043 and 5340z were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 3043

Released in 2004, 3043 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose 5340z

Released in 2004, 5340z has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.14 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras