CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Concord 3043
vs Concord 3345z

Archive illustration for Concord 3043

Concord / 2004

3043

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Concord 3345z

Concord / 2004

3345z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
3043
31 mm²
3345z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The 3043 and 3345z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

3043Metric3345z
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.15 µmPixel pitch3.15 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area9.91 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density10.09 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight159 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 3043 and 3345z have the same sensor area. The 3043 has the lighter body. The 3043 and 3345z have the same effective resolution. The 3043 and 3345z were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 3043

Released in 2004, 3043 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose 3345z

Released in 2004, 3345z has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 159 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras