CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio QV-700
vs Nikon Coolpix 100

Archive illustration for Casio QV-700

Casio / 1997

QV-700

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 100

Nikon / 1997

Coolpix 100

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

17 mm²
QV-700
17 mm²
Coolpix 100
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The QV-700 and Coolpix 100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

QV-700MetricCoolpix 100
0.3 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
7.59 µmPixel pitch7.59 µm
57.6 µm²Pixel area57.6 µm²
1.74 MP/cm²Pixel density1.74 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
290 gWeight200 g
Internal storageStorageInternal storage
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The QV-700 and Coolpix 100 have the same sensor area. The Coolpix 100 has the lighter body. The QV-700 and Coolpix 100 have the same effective resolution. The QV-700 and Coolpix 100 were both released in 1997. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose QV-700

Released in 1997, QV-700 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 290 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 100

Released in 1997, Coolpix 100 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras