Reasons to choose QV-700
Released in 1997, QV-700 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 290 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio QV-700
vs Casio QV-770
VS
Sensor area
17 mm²
QV-70017 mm²
QV-770- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The QV-700 and QV-770 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
QV-700MetricQV-770
0.3 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
7.59 µmPixel pitch7.59 µm
57.6 µm²Pixel area57.6 µm²
1.74 MP/cm²Pixel density1.74 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
290 gWeight300 g
Internal storageStorageInternal storage
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-700 and QV-770 have the same sensor area. The QV-700 has the lighter body. The QV-700 and QV-770 have the same effective resolution. The QV-770 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-770
Released in 1998, QV-770 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.