Reasons to choose QV-2300UX
Released in 2000, QV-2300UX has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio QV-2300UX
vs Casio QV-2900UX
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
QV-2300UX21 mm²
QV-2900UX- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The QV-2300UX and QV-2900UX have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
QV-2300UXMetricQV-2900UX
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.35 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
245 gWeight295 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The QV-2300UX and QV-2900UX have the same sensor area. The QV-2300UX has the lighter body. The QV-2300UX and QV-2900UX have the same effective resolution. The QV-2900UX is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-2900UX
Released in 2001, QV-2900UX has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 295 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.