CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio QV-2100
vs Casio QV-2400UX

Archive illustration for Casio QV-2100

Casio / 2001

QV-2100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio QV-2400UX

Casio / 2001

QV-2400UX

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
QV-2100
21 mm²
QV-2400UX
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The QV-2100 and QV-2400UX have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

QV-2100MetricQV-2400UX
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.35 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight245 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The QV-2100 and QV-2400UX have the same sensor area. The QV-2400UX has the lighter body. The QV-2100 and QV-2400UX have the same effective resolution. The QV-2100 and QV-2400UX were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose QV-2100

Released in 2001, QV-2100 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose QV-2400UX

Released in 2001, QV-2400UX has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras