CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-Z60
vs Casio QV-R52

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-Z60

Casio / 2006

Exilim EX-Z60

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio QV-R52

Casio / 2005

QV-R52

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Exilim EX-Z60
38 mm²
QV-R52
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Exilim EX-Z60 and QV-R52 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-Z60MetricQV-R52
6 MPEffective pixels5.25 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.51 µmPixel pitch2.69 µm
6.32 µm²Pixel area7.22 µm²
15.83 MP/cm²Pixel density13.85 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
118 gWeight168 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-Z60 and QV-R52 have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-Z60 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-Z60 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-Z60 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-Z60

Released in 2006, Exilim EX-Z60 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 118 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose QV-R52

Released in 2005, QV-R52 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.25 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras