CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-Z3000
vs Casio Exilim EX-ZS10

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-Z3000

Casio / 2011

Exilim EX-Z3000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10

Casio / 2011

Exilim EX-ZS10

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Exilim EX-Z3000
28 mm²
Exilim EX-ZS10
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Exilim EX-Z3000 and Exilim EX-ZS10 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-Z3000MetricExilim EX-ZS10
16.57 MPEffective pixels14.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.31 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
1.72 µm²Pixel area2.02 µm²
58.22 MP/cm²Pixel density49.54 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
148 gWeight204 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryRechargeable lithium ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-Z3000 and Exilim EX-ZS10 have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-Z3000 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-Z3000 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-Z3000 and Exilim EX-ZS10 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-Z3000

Released in 2011, Exilim EX-Z3000 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.57 MP effective resolution, and a 148 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-ZS10

Released in 2011, Exilim EX-ZS10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.1 MP effective resolution, and a 204 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras