CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-S20
vs Casio GV-20

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-S20

Casio / 2003

Exilim EX-S20

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio GV-20

Casio / 2002

GV-20

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Exilim EX-S20
15 mm²
GV-20
Area ratio
1.41:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
40.6%

The Exilim EX-S20 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-S20MetricGV-20
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.5 × 3.37
3.35 µmPixel pitch2.83 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area7.98 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density12.53 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
78 gWeight320 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-S20 has the larger sensor area. The Exilim EX-S20 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-S20 and GV-20 have the same effective resolution. The Exilim EX-S20 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-S20

Released in 2003, Exilim EX-S20 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 78 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose GV-20

Released in 2002, GV-20 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras