CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-S2
vs Casio QV-5700

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-S2

Casio / 2002

Exilim EX-S2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio QV-5700

Casio / 2002

QV-5700

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Exilim EX-S2
38 mm²
QV-5700
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Exilim EX-S2 and QV-5700 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-S2MetricQV-5700
2 MPEffective pixels4.9 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.35 µmPixel pitch2.78 µm
18.95 µm²Pixel area7.73 µm²
5.28 MP/cm²Pixel density12.93 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
86 gWeight355 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-S2 and QV-5700 have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-S2 has the lighter body. The QV-5700 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-S2 and QV-5700 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-S2

Released in 2002, Exilim EX-S2 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 86 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose QV-5700

Released in 2002, QV-5700 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 355 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras