CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-S100
vs Casio Exilim EX-Z30

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-S100

Casio / 2004

Exilim EX-S100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-Z30

Casio / 2004

Exilim EX-Z30

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
Exilim EX-S100
25 mm²
Exilim EX-Z30
Area ratio
1.64:1
Absolute difference
10 mm²
Relative difference
63.8%

The Exilim EX-Z30 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-S100MetricExilim EX-Z30
3.2 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.83 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area8.01 µm²
21.1 MP/cm²Pixel density12.48 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
123 gWeight121 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-Z30 has the larger sensor area. The Exilim EX-Z30 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-S100 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-S100 and Exilim EX-Z30 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-S100

Released in 2004, Exilim EX-S100 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 123 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-Z30

Released in 2004, Exilim EX-Z30 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras