CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-P700
vs Casio QV-R62

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-P700

Casio / 2004

Exilim EX-P700

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio QV-R62

Casio / 2004

QV-R62

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Exilim EX-P700
38 mm²
QV-R62
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Exilim EX-P700 and QV-R62 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-P700MetricQV-R62
7.1 MPEffective pixels6 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.31 µmPixel pitch2.51 µm
5.34 µm²Pixel area6.32 µm²
18.74 MP/cm²Pixel density15.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
275 gWeight168 g
Internal storageStorageSecure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-P700 and QV-R62 have the same sensor area. The QV-R62 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-P700 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-P700 and QV-R62 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-P700

Released in 2004, Exilim EX-P700 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 7.1 MP effective resolution, and a 275 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose QV-R62

Released in 2004, QV-R62 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras