Reasons to choose Exilim EX-P600
Released in 2004, Exilim EX-P600 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.9 MP effective resolution, and a 275 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio Exilim EX-P600
vs Casio QV-R51
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Exilim EX-P60038 mm²
QV-R51- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Exilim EX-P600 and QV-R51 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Exilim EX-P600MetricQV-R51
5.9 MPEffective pixels4.9 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.53 µmPixel pitch2.78 µm
6.42 µm²Pixel area7.73 µm²
15.57 MP/cm²Pixel density12.93 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
275 gWeight168 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH included)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Exilim EX-P600 and QV-R51 have the same sensor area. The QV-R51 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-P600 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-P600 and QV-R51 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose QV-R51
Released in 2004, QV-R51 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.