CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-M20
vs Olympus C-200 Zoom

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-M20

Casio / 2003

Exilim EX-M20

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-200 Zoom

Olympus / 2001

C-200 Zoom

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Exilim EX-M20
21 mm²
C-200 Zoom
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Exilim EX-M20 and C-200 Zoom have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-M20MetricC-200 Zoom
2.11 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.18 µmPixel pitch3.18 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area10.1 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density9.9 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
80 gWeight285 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSmartMedia
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x CR-V3, 4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-M20 and C-200 Zoom have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-M20 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-M20 and C-200 Zoom have the same effective resolution. The Exilim EX-M20 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-M20

Released in 2003, Exilim EX-M20 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 80 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-200 Zoom

Released in 2001, C-200 Zoom has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 285 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras