CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-M20
vs Casio Exilim EX-Z3

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-M20

Casio / 2003

Exilim EX-M20

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-Z3

Casio / 2003

Exilim EX-Z3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Exilim EX-M20
25 mm²
Exilim EX-Z3
Area ratio
1.17:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
16.5%

The Exilim EX-Z3 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-M20MetricExilim EX-Z3
2.11 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.18 µmPixel pitch2.83 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area8.01 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density12.48 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
80 gWeight126 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-Z3 has the larger sensor area. The Exilim EX-M20 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-Z3 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-M20 and Exilim EX-Z3 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-M20

Released in 2003, Exilim EX-M20 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 80 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-Z3

Released in 2003, Exilim EX-Z3 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 126 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras