CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-M20
vs Casio Exilim EX-S20

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-M20

Casio / 2003

Exilim EX-M20

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-S20

Casio / 2003

Exilim EX-S20

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Exilim EX-M20
21 mm²
Exilim EX-S20
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Exilim EX-M20 and Exilim EX-S20 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-M20MetricExilim EX-S20
2.11 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.18 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
80 gWeight78 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-M20 and Exilim EX-S20 have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-S20 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-M20 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-M20 and Exilim EX-S20 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-M20

Released in 2003, Exilim EX-M20 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 80 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-S20

Released in 2003, Exilim EX-S20 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 78 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras