CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-M2
vs Olympus D-360L

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-M2

Casio / 2002

Exilim EX-M2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus D-360L

Olympus / 2000

D-360L

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Exilim EX-M2
38 mm²
D-360L
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Exilim EX-M2 and D-360L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-M2MetricD-360L
2 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.35 µmPixel pitch5.62 µm
18.95 µm²Pixel area31.58 µm²
5.28 MP/cm²Pixel density3.17 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
86 gWeight280 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSmartMedia
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-M2 and D-360L have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-M2 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-M2 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-M2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-M2

Released in 2002, Exilim EX-M2 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 86 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D-360L

Released in 2000, D-360L has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras