CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-FH150
vs Samsung NV24HD

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-FH150

Casio / 2010

Exilim EX-FH150

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung NV24HD

Samsung / 2008

NV24HD

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Exilim EX-FH150
28 mm²
NV24HD
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Exilim EX-FH150 and NV24HD have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-FH150MetricNV24HD
10.1 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.68 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.82 µm²Pixel area2.79 µm²
35.49 MP/cm²Pixel density35.84 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight195 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-FH150 and NV24HD have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-FH150 has the lighter body. The NV24HD has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-FH150 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-FH150

Released in 2010, Exilim EX-FH150 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose NV24HD

Released in 2008, NV24HD has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 195 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras