Reasons to choose Exilim EX-FH100
Released in 2010, Exilim EX-FH100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 181 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio Exilim EX-FH100
vs Casio Exilim EX-FS10
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Exilim EX-FH10028 mm²
Exilim EX-FS10- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Exilim EX-FH100 and Exilim EX-FS10 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Exilim EX-FH100MetricExilim EX-FS10
10.1 MPEffective pixels9.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.68 µmPixel pitch1.77 µm
2.82 µm²Pixel area3.13 µm²
35.49 MP/cm²Pixel density31.98 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
181 gWeight121 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Rechargeable lithium ion battery (NP-90)BatteryRechargeable lithium ion battery (NP-60)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Exilim EX-FH100 and Exilim EX-FS10 have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-FS10 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-FH100 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-FH100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Exilim EX-FS10
Released in 2009, Exilim EX-FS10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 9.1 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.