CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Casio Exilim EX-FC160s
vs Casio Exilim EX-H5

Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-FC160s

Casio / 2010

Exilim EX-FC160s

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Casio Exilim EX-H5

Casio / 2010

Exilim EX-H5

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Exilim EX-FC160s
28 mm²
Exilim EX-H5
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Exilim EX-FC160s and Exilim EX-H5 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Exilim EX-FC160sMetricExilim EX-H5
10.6 MPEffective pixels12.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.64 µmPixel pitch1.53 µm
2.68 µm²Pixel area2.35 µm²
37.25 MP/cm²Pixel density42.52 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight174 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryRechargeable NP-80 lithium ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Exilim EX-FC160s and Exilim EX-H5 have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-FC160s has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-H5 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-FC160s and Exilim EX-H5 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-FC160s

Released in 2010, Exilim EX-FC160s has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.6 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Exilim EX-H5

Released in 2010, Exilim EX-H5 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras