Reasons to choose Exilim EX-TR10
Released in 2013, Exilim EX-TR10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 169 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio Exilim EX-TR10
vs Casio Exilim EX-ZR400
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Exilim EX-TR1028 mm²
Exilim EX-ZR400- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Exilim EX-TR10 and Exilim EX-ZR400 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Exilim EX-TR10MetricExilim EX-ZR400
12.1 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.53 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
2.35 µm²Pixel area1.77 µm²
42.52 MP/cm²Pixel density56.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
169 gWeight205 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Rechargeable lithium ion battery NP-150BatteryRechargeable lithium ion battery NP-130
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Exilim EX-TR10 and Exilim EX-ZR400 have the same sensor area. The Exilim EX-TR10 has the lighter body. The Exilim EX-ZR400 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim EX-TR10 and Exilim EX-ZR400 were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Exilim EX-ZR400
Released in 2013, Exilim EX-ZR400 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.