CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS R6 Mark II
vs Nikon Zf

Archive illustration for Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Canon / 2022

EOS R6 Mark II

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Zf

Nikon / 2023

Zf

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

858 mm²
EOS R6 Mark II
858 mm²
Zf
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EOS R6 Mark II and Zf have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EOS R6 Mark IIMetricZf
24.2 MPEffective pixels24.5 MP
35.9 × 23.9Sensor35.9 × 23.9
5.95 µmPixel pitch5.92 µm
35.45 µm²Pixel area35.02 µm²
2.82 MP/cm²Pixel density2.86 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
670 gWeight710 g
SD/SDHC/SDXC, UHS-IIStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II), microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC (UHS-I)
LP-E6NH lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryEN-EL15c Lithium-Ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS R6 Mark II and Zf have the same sensor area. The EOS R6 Mark II has the lighter body. The Zf has the higher effective resolution. The Zf is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS R6 Mark II

Released in 2022, EOS R6 Mark II has about 858 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 670 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Zf

Released in 2023, Zf has about 858 mm² of sensor area, 24.5 MP effective resolution, and a 710 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras