CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS
vs Canon PowerShot S200

Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon / 2014

PowerShot SX60 HS

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot S200

Canon / 2014

PowerShot S200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
PowerShot SX60 HS
42 mm²
PowerShot S200
Area ratio
1.49:1
Absolute difference
14 mm²
Relative difference
49.2%

The PowerShot S200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

PowerShot SX60 HSMetricPowerShot S200
16.1 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.53 × 5.64
1.33 µmPixel pitch2.05 µm
1.77 µm²Pixel area4.2 µm²
56.57 MP/cm²Pixel density23.78 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.6
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,280 × 720
650 gWeight181 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Battery Pack NB-10LBatteryBattery Pack NB-6LH

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PowerShot S200 has the larger sensor area. The PowerShot S200 has the lighter body. The PowerShot SX60 HS has the higher effective resolution. The PowerShot SX60 HS and PowerShot S200 were both released in 2014. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PowerShot SX60 HS

Released in 2014, PowerShot SX60 HS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 650 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PowerShot S200

Released in 2014, PowerShot S200 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 181 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras