CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS
vs Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Canon / 2009

PowerShot SX120 IS

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon / 2011

PowerShot SX230 HS

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
PowerShot SX120 IS
28 mm²
PowerShot SX230 HS
Area ratio
1.15:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
14.6%

The PowerShot SX230 HS has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PowerShot SX120 ISMetricPowerShot SX230 HS
10 MPEffective pixels12.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.58 µmPixel pitch1.53 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area2.35 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density42.52 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
245 gWeight223 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
2 x AA batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion NB-5L rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PowerShot SX230 HS has the larger sensor area. The PowerShot SX230 HS has the lighter body. The PowerShot SX230 HS has the higher effective resolution. The PowerShot SX230 HS is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PowerShot SX120 IS

Released in 2009, PowerShot SX120 IS has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PowerShot SX230 HS

Released in 2011, PowerShot SX230 HS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 223 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras